top of page
DANIELE FORNI

How to Find the Best Executive Coach for Your Specific Leadership Challenge

 

Man in circular frame on left with text: "The Spiky Leader. How to Find the Best Executive Coach. Thought Leadership for Non-Standard Leaders."

Introduction

There are a lot of coaches out there. The market has grown considerably, credentials range from rigorous to decorative, and price is no reliable guide to quality. For a senior leader who has decided to invest in coaching, working out who to actually work with is both important and genuinely complex.

Not every coach is right for every leader. And not every leader is ready for every coach. When the match works, coaching is one of the most valuable professional investments a leader can make. When it is mismatched, it tends to confirm whatever scepticism the leader brought into the room. I would rather be honest about this than oversell what coaching can do.

This guide is designed to help you think clearly about what you are actually looking for in an executive coach, what to assess when you are evaluating coaches, and how to make a decision that you can feel genuinely confident about.

There is no universal answer to who the best executive coach is. There is only the best coach for you, your challenge, and where you are in your leadership journey right now.


Start with Clarity About Your Own Needs

The most common mistake leaders make when searching for an executive coach is starting with the coach rather than with themselves. Before you look at credentials, methodologies, or client lists, the most valuable thing you can do is get clear on what you actually need.


What is the specific challenge you are navigating?

Leadership challenges come in many forms. A leader preparing for a significant role transition has different needs from one who is working on a specific relationship difficulty with a peer or superior. A leader who needs to develop their executive presence and communication impact has different needs from one who is wrestling with questions of career direction and purpose. A leader managing a high-stakes organisational transformation has different needs from one working on the internal confidence to perform at the level their role demands.

The clearer you can be about the specific nature of your challenge, the more precisely you can assess whether a particular coach's experience and approach is relevant to what you are working on.


What kind of support are you actually looking for?

Some leaders want a coach who challenges them strongly, who pushes back on their thinking and holds up uncomfortable mirrors. Others need a different kind of support: a thinking partner who helps them process complexity, or a safe space to explore vulnerability in their leadership. Neither preference is wrong, but a coach whose natural style is confrontational and challenging is not a good fit for a leader who needs gentle, exploratory support, and vice versa.


How committed are you to the process?

This is a question that deserves honest reflection. Executive coaching works when the leader brings genuine commitment to the process, which means showing up with openness, doing the reflective work between sessions, and being willing to examine things about themselves that may be uncomfortable. If your current life is so overloaded that coaching would become another obligation rather than a genuine resource, that is worth acknowledging before you invest.


What to Look for in an Executive Coach


Credentials and training

Coaching is not a regulated profession in the same way that medicine or law is. Anyone can call themselves an executive coach. This makes credentials more important as a signal of professional seriousness, not less. Credentialling bodies like the International Coaching Federation (ICF), the European Mentoring and Coaching Council (EMCC), and the Association for Coaching (AC) provide frameworks for assessing coach training and professional standards.

ICF credentials, for example, are awarded at Associate Certified Coach (ACC), Professional Certified Coach (PCC), and Master Certified Coach (MCC) levels, each requiring a minimum number of coaching hours, demonstrated competency, and ongoing development. A coach with an ICF PCC or MCC credential has met a significant set of professional requirements that provide meaningful assurance about the quality of their training and practice.

Credentials are not the whole picture, but they are a useful starting point for filtering a large and varied field.


Experience in your context

A coach does not need to have done your job to be an excellent coach for you. In fact, some of the most valuable coaching comes from coaches who are outside your industry, precisely because they are not constrained by the assumptions and frameworks that insiders share. What does matter is that the coach has experience working with leaders at your level, navigating challenges of similar complexity, and in contexts that have some relevance to the dynamics you are managing.

A coach who has worked exclusively with early-career professionals may not have the frame of reference needed to coach effectively at the C-suite level. A coach who has only worked in corporate environments may struggle to support a leader navigating the dynamics of a professional services partnership or a family business leadership context. Ask about the kinds of leaders and challenges the coach has worked with and assess whether that experience is relevant to what you are facing.


Coaching approach and methodology

Different coaches have different approaches, and it is worth understanding what a prospective coach's approach actually involves. Some coaches are primarily non-directive, meaning they follow the client's agenda entirely and avoid sharing their own perspectives or observations. Others use a more active, challenging style that includes direct feedback, observations, and structured frameworks. Some integrate psychometric tools and assessments into their coaching. Others work more intuitively and relationally.

There is no single correct coaching approach. What matters is that the approach fits both the coach's genuine way of working and what you, as the client, actually need. Ask coaches to describe their approach. Notice whether their description feels coherent and whether it resonates with what you are looking for.


The quality of listening and questioning

This is something you can only assess in an actual conversation. No amount of research replaces it. The quality of a coach’s listening is fundamental. Do they really hear what you are saying, including what is beneath the surface of your words? Do their questions open new thinking rather than confirming what you already believe? Do you feel both safe and slightly challenged?

An initial discovery conversation with a prospective coach is the most direct way to assess this. Treat that conversation as data. Notice how you feel during it. Whether you find yourself thinking more clearly or more superficially. Whether you feel genuinely heard. Whether the coach's questions take you somewhere interesting.


Chemistry and trust

Coaching requires a level of honesty and vulnerability that is only possible when the client genuinely trusts the coach. Trust is built over time, but there needs to be a foundation of it from the beginning. The chemistry between a coach and client is not just a soft, personal preference. It is a functional prerequisite for the quality of the work.

Do not dismiss a lack of chemistry as something that will sort itself out. It won’t. If you leave the initial conversation feeling you could not be fully honest with this person, that signal is important. Trust it.


Questions to Ask When Evaluating Coaches

When you are in conversation with a prospective executive coach, there are specific questions that will give you more useful information than a general discussion of their background and approach:

  1. What is your coaching approach, and how do you adapt it to different leaders and different kinds of challenges?

  2. What kinds of leaders do you typically work with, and what are the most common challenges they bring to coaching?

  3. How do you think about success in a coaching engagement, and how do we know if the coaching is working?

  4. What is your experience working with leaders navigating the specific kind of challenge I have described?

  5. How do you manage confidentiality, particularly in organisationally-sponsored coaching arrangements?

  6. What are your professional credentials and ongoing development commitments?

  7. What would you say are the conditions under which your coaching approach is most effective, and are there situations where you would recommend a different kind of support?

Notice not just what the coach says in response to these questions but how they say it. Whether they are direct, reflective, and honest. Whether they acknowledge the limits of what coaching can do. Whether they are curious about you and your situation, or primarily interested in presenting their own credentials.


Red Flags to Watch For

In a market where the quality of executive coaching varies considerably, there are some specific signals that warrant caution:

  1. A coach who promises specific outcomes or guarantees results: coaching outcomes depend heavily on the client's engagement and the complexity of the situation. No honest coach can guarantee what will change.

  2. A coach who talks significantly more than they listen in the initial conversation: if the person who will be coaching you is more interested in telling you about themselves than in understanding you, that pattern is unlikely to improve once you are paying for the sessions.

  3. A coach who does not ask about fit or suitability: a good coach knows that they are not the right fit for every client and is genuinely interested in understanding whether the match is right, not just in signing up the engagement.

  4. A coach who cannot articulate their approach clearly: if a coach cannot explain how they work in plain language, that lack of clarity is not a good sign for the quality of the process you would experience with them.

  5. A coach who avoids or deflects questions about their credentials and experience: professional coaches are proud of their training and their track record. Evasiveness about these is a meaningful signal.


Making the Decision

After conversations with one or more prospective coaches, the decision involves both rational and intuitive dimensions. The rational dimension is the assessment of credentials, experience, approach, and fit with your specific challenge. The intuitive dimension is the sense you have, from the conversation itself, of whether this is a person with whom you could be genuinely honest and from whom you could receive the kind of challenge and support you need.

Both dimensions matter. A coach with excellent credentials whose style leaves you feeling vaguely defensive or unseen is not the right coach for you, regardless of their professional qualifications. A coach you feel immediately comfortable with but who lacks the depth of experience to work at the level your challenge demands is similarly not the right choice.

The best choice is usually the coach who combines genuine professional rigour with a style that you can imagine being fully honest with, over a sustained period of time, on the things that actually matter.

If you are navigating a significant leadership challenge and want to know whether working together would be a strong fit, I welcome an initial conversation. I will be honest with you about whether my approach is right for what you are working on, including if I think it is not.


Frequently Asked Questions


1. How many coaches should I speak with before making a decision?

Speaking with two to three coaches before making a decision is a reasonable approach. This gives you enough comparison to understand what different approaches feel like without becoming so overwhelming that the evaluation process itself becomes a barrier to starting. That said, if you have a strong and clear sense of alignment with the first coach you speak with, there is no rule that says you must continue evaluating. The quality of the initial conversation is the most reliable guide.


2. Does the coach's industry background matter?

Somewhat, but less than many leaders assume. A coach's industry background can be helpful context, but the most important expertise in executive coaching is expertise in the coaching process itself, not in the client's industry. Coaches from outside an industry often bring valuable perspectives precisely because they are not constrained by industry assumptions. What matters more than industry is whether the coach has experience working with leaders at similar levels of complexity and seniority.


3. Should I choose a coach who specialises in my specific challenge?

Having a coach with relevant experience in the kind of challenge you are navigating is valuable, but specialisation can be taken too far. Leadership is fundamentally interconnected, and what presents as a specific challenge, say difficulty influencing senior stakeholders, is often connected to broader patterns in the leader's thinking, habits, and identity. A good executive coach can work with the whole picture, not just the surface presenting issue.


4. What is the difference between a certified coach and a non-certified one?

Certified coaches have completed recognised coach training programmes and met the requirements of a credentialling body such as the ICF, EMCC, or AC. Non-certified coaches may have excellent capabilities developed through experience, but without independent verification of their training and practice standards. In a market where anyone can use the title coach, certification provides meaningful assurance that a coach has received proper training and has been assessed against professional competency standards.


5. Is it better to use an internal coach provided by my organisation or an external one?

Both have value, but they serve somewhat different purposes. An internal coach may have better context for the organisation's culture and dynamics, but they are embedded in the same system as the client, which inevitably limits the depth of confidentiality and the breadth of challenge that is possible. An external coach brings full independence, complete confidentiality, and freedom from organisational politics. For the most sensitive leadership challenges, external coaching is generally more suitable.


6. How important is chemistry in the choice of coach?

It is very important, because the coaching relationship requires a level of honesty and vulnerability that is only possible when genuine trust exists. You do not need to feel immediately comfortable with every aspect of the coach's style, and indeed a certain productive discomfort is part of good coaching. But if you leave the initial conversation feeling that you could not be fully honest with this person, that is a meaningful signal that should not be dismissed.


7. What should I do if the coaching is not working after a few sessions?

Raise it with the coach directly. A good coach will welcome this conversation and will use it as important data about what needs to change in the coaching approach, the focus, or the dynamic between you. If the coaching is genuinely not working after a reasonable period of honest engagement, it is also reasonable to conclude that the match is not right and to seek a different coach. This is not a failure; it is a recognition that fit matters.

8. Can I change coaches mid-engagement if things are not working out?

Yes. You are always free to conclude a coaching engagement if it is not serving you. Most coaching contracts are structured with reasonable notice periods. There is no obligation to continue a coaching relationship that is not working, and the practical and financial implications of transitioning to a different coach are manageable. The cost of continuing with a poorly matched coach is higher than the cost of making a change.


9. Is there a difference between executive coaching and leadership coaching?

The terms are often used interchangeably, and in practice the distinction is not sharp. Executive coaching tends to be associated with very senior leaders and C-suite contexts. Leadership coaching is sometimes used more broadly to include leaders at various levels who are working on their leadership effectiveness. Both involve individual one-on-one professional coaching focused on the leader's development and performance. Daniele Forni's practice serves senior leaders across both framings.


10. How do I start the process of finding the right executive coach with Daniele Forni?

Reach out through the contact details on this website. The first conversation is complimentary and carries no obligation. I am genuinely interested in whether my approach is right for what you are working on, and I will be direct with you if I think something else would serve you better.


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page